|
G1. TIP Number: |
634078
|
|
G2. State: |
Missouri
|
|
G3. Multiple agencies / jurisdictions?
|
No
This project itself is not funded by multiple agencies. However, KCATA, City of KCMO, and City of NKC are important partners in funding the ongoing operations of the program.
|
|
G4 Project contact: |
Eric Vaughan, Director of Bike Share Services, eric.vaughan@bikewalkkc.org, 816-205-7056
|
|
G5 Purpose and need:
|
This project expands the current bike share system, replaces out of date equipment, and supports transition to new bike share technologies that more flexible and adaptive.
|
| |
|
G6. Origin and ending
|
Route:
From:
To:
Length (Miles):
|
|
|
G7 Functional Classification:
|
Not Applicable
|
|
G8 Connected KC 2050 Decade?
|
2020
|
|
G9 Muli-Agency Plan?
|
Yes
Bike Share is included in the Smart Moves 3.0 plan from MARC, KCATA, and local municipalities. Specifically it is an important element of the Mobility Hub strategy.
|
|
G10 Included in a CIP?
|
No
|
|
G11 Planning stage:
|
|
|
G12 Reviewed by state DOT?
|
--Select--
|
|
G13 Right-of-Way acquisition: |
All acquired or none needed
|
|
G14 ROW by local public agency process manual?
|
No
|
|
G15 Other unique local goals and objectives?
|
No
Bike Share is included in many local bike-related plans. These include the draft KCMO Bike Master Plan, the North KC bike plan, and numerous local plans.
|
|
G16 Transportation Disadvantaged Population:
|
Future planning for the bike share system focuses on increasing access in areas with transportation disadvantaged populations, and expanding into more disadvantaged areas. We especially focus on City of KCMO LifeX program, which are ZIP Codes where residents have significantly lower life expectancies than the rest of the city. Many census tracts in these areas have 50% or higher zero-car households.
Our Bike Share For All equity program focuses on providing access in partnership with agencies that serve residents of public housing, people experiencing homelessness, and those transition out of incarceration and back into society.
|
|
G17 Relevant Public Engagement:
|
Continuous engagement with stakeholders includes working with neighborhood associations, local governments, business associations, community improvement districts, and social service agencies. Input from those stakeholders informs where we place bike share hubs and how we market the program.
|
|
G18 Planned Public Engagement:
|
Continuous engagement with stakeholders includes working with neighborhood associations, local governments, business associations, community improvement districts, and social service agencies. Input from those stakeholders informs where we place bike share hubs and how we market the program.
|
|
G19 Sustainable Places Criteria:
|
Access to Healthy Foods---Active Transportation/Living-------Compact, Walkable Centers---
----------------
------------Integrated Trail System---
Mixed-Density Neighborhoods-------Optimize Parking-------
----------------
------
|
|
G19.1 Describe PSP relationship:
|
|
|
G20 Implements Sustainable Places Initiatives?
|
Yes
The Woodland Plaza PSP includes a Mobility Hub with Bike Share.
|
|
G21 Serves Regional Activity Center?
|
Yes
Highest-Intensity and Most-Walkable Centers
Bike Share is located in several activity centers across the region, often in conjunction with transit facilities.
|
|
G22 Environmental justice tracts?
|
Yes
Bike Share increasingly serves EJ tracts and this project will allow for more service. For example, Bike Share is integrated with the new Prospect MAX, providing new multi-modal connections for those in EJ tracts.
|
|
G23 Reduces greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Yes
Providing more options for traveling beyond a single-occupant vehicle helps reduce VMT and greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
G24 Natural Resource information:
|
|
|
G25 Community Links at Watershaed Scale:
|
|
|
G26 Explain local land use or comprehensive plans:
|
Bike Share is included in many plans like the KCMO Draft Bike Plan, North Kansas City Bike Plan, and several Area Plans throughout KCMO.
|
| |
|
CMAQ Federal amount
|
250000
|
|
CMAQ Match amount:
|
62500
|
|
CMAQ Year requested:
|
2023
|
|
STP Federal amount:
|
250000
|
|
STP Match amount:
|
62500
|
|
STP Year requested:
|
2024
|
|
TAP Federal amount:
|
250000
|
|
TAP Match amount:
|
62500
|
|
TAP Year requested:
|
2023
|
|
Source of Local Match:
|
NOTE: We are requesting funds from any source and split between both program years. Local match comes from non-federal funds.
|
| |
|
Explain:
|
|
| |
|
Scope Change:
|
The project can be scaled down to the available funding by purchasing fewer bikes.
|
| |
|
Cost by area: |
|
Engineering:
|
0
|
|
Equipment Purchase:
|
383000
|
|
Right-of-Way:
|
0
|
|
Other:
|
0
|
|
Utility Adjustment/Relocation:
|
0
|
|
Program Implementation/Construction (including Construction Engineering/Inspection):
|
242000
|
|
Contingency:
|
0
|
|
Total Estimated Project Cost:
|
625000
|
| |
|
Cost Breakdown by mode:
|
|
Highway:
|
%
|
|
Transit:
|
%
|
|
Bike:
|
100 %
|
|
Pedestrian:
|
%
|
|
Other:
|
%
|
