|
PA CMT Description:
|
Existing traffic signals at 72nd/Troost and 72nd/Woodland are single phase only allowing only one direction of travel at a time. Improvements will provide protected left turns and traffic signal coordination to reduce congestion. Additional transit amenities are being evaluated at N Oak to provide additional non-vehicular travel options. In-fill sidewalks and ADA improvements will improve access for all system users.
|
|
PA SOV Capacity:
|
Project includes only new turn lanes to improve traffic flow. There is the opportunity to partner with MoDOT for the improvements at the M-1 & 72nd Street intersection. Geometric and technology improvements will provide a reduction in the congestion at this location.
|
|
PA Pre-application Statement:
|
Changes made
|
|
PA Pre-application Statement Text:
|
Project scope has been reduced. New turn lanes at N. Troost and N. Woodland have been replaced with adaptive signals at these locations. The remainder of the project remains unchanged: new in-fill sidewalks and ADA ramp upgrades, pedestrian and adaptive signal upgrades at N. Troost and N. Woodland, and intersection improvements at M-1.
|
|
PA Pre-Application Staff Alignment:
|
|
|
PA Pre-Aplication Policy Concerns:
|
|
|
G1. TIP Number: |
|
|
G2. State: |
Missouri
|
|
G3. Multiple agencies / jurisdictions?
|
Yes
Gladstone Special Road District (separate political entity)
|
|
G4 Project contact: |
Timothy A. Nebergall - Gladstone Director of Public Works
|
|
G5 Purpose and need:
|
NE/NW 72nd Street is a major east/west corridor in the northland. Adding sidewalks and improving traffic flow will further enhance the corridor. Existing traffic signals at N Troost and N Woodland operate in a single phase which results in congestion along the corridor. The intersection at M-1 requires additional capacity.
|
| |
|
G6. Origin and ending
|
Route:
From:
To:
Length (Miles):
|
NE/NW 72nd Street
M-1
N. Broadway
2.00000
|
|
G7 Functional Classification:
|
Minor Arterial
|
|
G8 Connected KC 2050 Decade?
|
2020
|
|
G9 Muli-Agency Plan?
|
No
|
|
G10 Included in a CIP?
|
Yes
Capital Improvements Sales Tax Fund, Transportation Sales Tax Fund, Gladstone Special Road District
|
|
G11 Planning stage:
|
Preliminary Plan
|
|
G12 Reviewed by state DOT?
|
No
|
|
G13 Right-of-Way acquisition: |
Not started
|
|
G14 ROW by local public agency process manual?
|
No
|
|
G15 Other unique local goals and objectives?
|
Yes
Meets the recommendations of the Citys Comprehensive Plan and Sidewalk Master Plan
|
|
G16 Transportation Disadvantaged Population:
|
72nd Street is a major east/west and is entirely Census Tract 211.01, Clay County, Missouri. The corridor carries a large amount of pedestrian traffic. Furthermore, significant congestion is experienced due to the operation of existing signals and intersections along the corridor resulting in additional cost and travel time for all users.
|
|
G17 Relevant Public Engagement:
|
The Comprehensive Plan and Sidewalk Master Plan included significant public engagement components. Sidewalks on 72nd Street were identified as a top priority.
|
|
G18 Planned Public Engagement:
|
Additional public engagement will be conducted as the project moves forward.
|
|
G19 Sustainable Places Criteria:
|
Access to Healthy Foods---Active Transportation/Living---Age in Place---Compact, Walkable Centers---
Complete Street Design---------------
----------------
Mixed-Density Neighborhoods---------------
----------------
------
|
|
G19.1 Describe PSP relationship:
|
Provides access to Hyvee and the Gladstone farmers market, promotes an active lifestyle, Gladstone has received a gold rating for aging in place, supports downtown gladstone and the Citys efforts to have a walkable community, connects multiple types of uses, connects to activity centers.
|
|
G20 Implements Sustainable Places Initiatives?
|
Yes
Project connects to the N. Oak Complete Streets PSP and will further enhance the improvements recommended in that study. Recommendations from the regional wayfinding signage PSP will be incorporated into the project where feasible.
|
|
G21 Serves Regional Activity Center?
|
Yes
High-Intensity and More_Walkable Centers
The project will improve access to N. Oak Trafficway and N. Broadway which are both moderate activity centers. Due to its proximity to downtown Gladstone, the project is expected to further build civic engagement in the community and reinvestment in peoples community.
|
|
G22 Environmental justice tracts?
|
Yes
The project is located entirely within environmental justice Census Tract 211.01, Clay County, Missouri. Due to gaps in the existing sidewalk system, pedestrians are required to walk in grassed areas and/or cross the street.
|
|
G23 Reduces greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Yes
Project will provide sidewalks where none exist. Project will improve traffic signal operations along the corridor and add capacity at M-1.
|
|
G24 Natural Resource information:
|
The project area is nearly developed. Conservation and restoration measures will include the preservation of trees when possible and the implementation of stormwater BMPs in accordance with the Citys NPDES Phase 2 stormwater program. All existing street lighting is LED.
|
|
G25 Community Links at Watershaed Scale:
|
|
|
G26 Explain local land use or comprehensive plans:
|
2008 Gladstone Comprehensive Plan, Village Center Master Plan
|
| |
|
CMAQ Federal amount
|
500000
|
|
CMAQ Match amount:
|
400000
|
|
CMAQ Year requested:
|
2024
|
|
STP Federal amount:
|
2100000
|
|
STP Match amount:
|
750000
|
|
STP Year requested:
|
2024
|
|
Source of Local Match:
|
Capital Improvements Sales Tax, Transportation Sales tax, Gladstone Special Road District
|
| |
|
Explain:
|
|
| |
|
Scope Change:
|
Yes, project can be phased in multiple ways. 1. Sidewalks and adapative signals. 2. M-1 intersection
|
| |
|
Cost by area: |
|
Engineering:
|
600000
|
|
Equipment Purchase:
|
0
|
|
Right-of-Way:
|
100000
|
|
Other:
|
0
|
|
Utility Adjustment/Relocation:
|
0
|
|
Program Implementation/Construction (including Construction Engineering/Inspection):
|
3000000
|
|
Contingency:
|
750000
|
|
Total Estimated Project Cost:
|
4450000
|
| |
|
Cost Breakdown by mode:
|
|
Highway:
|
70 %
|
|
Transit:
|
%
|
|
Bike:
|
%
|
|
Pedestrian:
|
30 %
|
|
Other:
|
%
|
