G1. TIP Number: |
|
G2. State: |
Kansas
|
G3. Multiple agencies / jurisdictions?
|
No
|
G4 Project contact: |
Lauren Anderson
LAnderson@leavenworthcounty.gov
(913)684 0471
|
G5 Purpose and need:
|
Leavenworth County is in the process of planning/creating a corridor that connects communities and residents all along the western side of the County and into adjacent counties. This will create efficient movement and help connect residents to their jobs and communities as well as help goods and services get in and out of those communities. This bridge is located on that planned corridor. At a reduced width and reduced weight limit, the existing conditions limit the movements allowed and restrict the connectivity and growth that Leavenworth is striving for.
|
|
G6. Origin and ending
|
  Route:
  From:
  To:
  Length (Miles):
|
0.20000
|
G7 Functional Classification:
|
Major Collector
|
G8 Connected KC 2050 Decade?
|
2020
|
G9 Muli-Agency Plan?
|
No
|
G10 Included in a CIP?
|
Yes
The Leavenworth County Board of County Commissioners approved a CIP in 2020 that includes the replacement of E-18 in 2025
|
G11 Planning stage:
|
Preliminary Plan
|
G12 Reviewed by state DOT?
|
No
|
G13 Right-of-Way acquisition: |
Not started
|
G14 ROW by local public agency process manual?
|
Yes
|
G15 Other unique local goals and objectives?
|
No
|
G16 Transportation Disadvantaged Population:
|
|
G17 Relevant Public Engagement:
|
|
G18 Planned Public Engagement:
|
|
G19 Sustainable Places Criteria:
|
----------------
Complete Street Design---Connected Street Network-----------
----Green Infrastructure-----------
----------------
----------------
------
|
G19.1 Describe PSP relationship:
|
E-18 is located along a western corridor that connects the City of Easton, the City of Tonganoxie, Kansas Highways 16, 92 and 192 as well as US 24-40. All roads current tly exist but several portions of the corridor need upgrading for efficient travel. Upgrading E-18 is the final link in the connection of the City of Easton to the rest of the western communities. The addition of 4 foot paved shoulders on the bridge provide safe passage for non-motorized users and will not need to be reconstruction if the County ever expands County Route 21 to a ‘Shared Road’ design. The use of native grasses will return the surrounding area to the natural habit, help slow the flow of stormwater and filter the runoff before ever entering the creek system.
|
G20 Implements Sustainable Places Initiatives?
|
No
Does not apply
|
G21 Serves Regional Activity Center?
|
Yes
Less-Intense and Less-Walkable Centers
County Route 21 feeds directly into the southern side of the City of Easton. Available roadways for recreational cyclists to use is limited in the City of Easton and the surrounding area. Those headed south, out of Easton will use County Route 21 and bridge E-18 as it is the only paved road in this direction and it provides connection to other areas.
|
G22 Environmental justice tracts?
|
No
|
G23 Reduces greenhouse gas emissions?
|
No
|
G24 Natural Resource information:
|
After construction, the county will restore the right of way and creek bank with the use of native grasses, returning the surrounding area to its natural habitat.
|
G25 Community Links at Watershaed Scale:
|
After construction, the county will restore the right of way and creek bank with the use of native grasses, providing filtration for stormwater runoff before it reaches the creek system.
|
G26 Explain local land use or comprehensive plans:
|
|
|
STP Federal amount:
|
884000 
|
STP Match amount:
|
221000 
|
STP Year requested:
|
2024
|
Source of Local Match:
|
Special Highway Fund - Resources for fund are budgeted within the Local Service and Road & Bridge mill levy funds
|
|
Explain:
|
|
|
Scope Change:
|
This project cannot be phased, local match would be increased to make up difference.
|
|
Cost by area: |
Engineering:
|
0
|
Equipment Purchase:
|
0
|
Right-of-Way:
|
10000
|
Other:
|
0
|
Utility Adjustment/Relocation:
|
30000
|
Program Implementation/Construction (including Construction Engineering/Inspection):
|
1035000
|
Contingency:
|
30000
|
Total Estimated Project Cost:
|
1105000
|
|
Cost Breakdown by mode:
|
Highway:
|
80  %
|
Transit:
|
  %
|
Bike:
|
20  %
|
Pedestrian:
|
  %
|
Other:
|
  %
|